聊一聊为什么我要整合Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection和Castle.Core DependencyInjection Extensions. 聊一聊为什么我要整合 Microsoft. Dependency Extensions Injection Microsoft Castle.
前言
如果用到动态代理,大家可能会有几种选择,排到前列的是Autofac+Castle、AspectCore和DoraInterception,
我将从我当时研究的经历,以及我遇到的场景,为大家展示下
聊一聊我为什么要费时费力的整合Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection和Castle.Core
当时遇到的场景
直接上源码
public interface IEventHandler
{
Task<bool> HandleAsync(IEvent @event);
bool CanHandle(IEvent @event);
}
public interface IEventHandler<T> : IEventHandler
where T : class, IEvent
{
Task<bool> HandleAsync(T @event);
bool IEventHandler.CanHandle(IEvent @event) => @event.GetType() == typeof(T);//语言特性:默认实现 2024-1-15 10:23:10
Task<bool> IEventHandler.HandleAsync(IEvent @event) => CanHandle((T)@event) //语言特性:默认实现 2024-1-15 10:23:10
? HandleAsync((T)@event)
: Task.FromResult(false);
}
public interface IEvent
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public DateTime OccurredOn { get; set; }
}
如上所示的接口定义了一个事件处理接口,其中HandleAsync方法是事件处理的入口,CanHandle方法用于判断事件是否可以处理,在程序解耦、异步、削峰填谷等场景中,如上的接口可以有很多的应用,也可以扩展到内存级别、RabbitMQ、Redis、Kafka、RocketMQ等中间件的适配的事件处理器,以提供更强大的性能和更丰富的应用场景。所以说这是一个比较通用的场景。
我们将为该处理器提供一个检查幂等的拦截器( Idempotent)
AspectCore
事件定义如下
public class CatchLoggingOccurredEvent : IEvent
{
protected CatchLoggingOccurredEvent()
{
OccurredOn = DateTime.Now;
}
public CatchLoggingOccurredEvent(long id)
: this()
{
Id = id;
}
public long Id { get; set; }
public DateTime OccurredOn { get; set; }
}
事件处理器及Aspecore定义的特性
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public class CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler
: IEventHandler<CatchLoggingOccurredEvent>
{
[Idempotent]
public async virtual Task<bool> HandleAsync(CatchLoggingOccurredEvent @event)
{
await Console.Out.WriteLineAsync($"{nameof(CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler)}处理事件:\t事件【{@event.Id}】@@@@@@发生于【{@event.OccurredOn}】");
return true;
}
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = false)]
internal class IdempotentAttribute
: AbstractInterceptorAttribute
{
public override async Task Invoke(AspectContext context, AspectDelegate next)
{
var logger = context.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<ILogger<IdempotentAttribute>>();
logger.LogInformation("幂等检查");
await next(context);
}
}
执行
报错如下
System.TypeLoadException:“Declaration referenced in a method implementation cannot be a final method. Type: 'AspectCore.DynamicGenerated.CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler'. Assembly: 'AspectCore.DynamicProxy.Generator, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'.”
应该是AspectCore认为我的handle方法为一个不可覆写的方法所以抛错,该问题我已提issue至 https://github.com/dotnetcore/AspectCore-Framework/issues/319 等待解决
DoraInterception
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public class CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler
: IEventHandler<CatchLoggingOccurredEvent>
{
private readonly ILogger<CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler> _logger;
public CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler(ILogger<CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler> logger)
{
_logger = logger;
}
[Idempotent]
public async virtual Task<bool> HandleAsync(CatchLoggingOccurredEvent message)
{
await Console.Out.WriteLineAsync($"{nameof(CatchLoggingOccurredEventHandler)}处理事件:\t事件【{message.Id}】@@@@@@发生于【{message.OccurredOn}】");
return true;
}
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = false)]
internal class IdempotentAttribute
: InterceptorAttribute
{
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
/// <param name="invocationContext"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public async ValueTask InvokeAsync(InvocationContext invocationContext)
{
var logger = invocationContext.InvocationServices.GetRequiredService<ILogger<IdempotentAttribute>>();
logger.LogInformation("幂等检查");
await invocationContext.ProceedAsync();
}
}
执行 报错如下:Dora.Interception.InterceptionException:“It fails to generate proxy class. (69,130): error CS0234: 命名空间“Microsoft.Extensions”中不存在类型或命名空间名“Logging”(是否缺少程序集引用?) (69,220): error CS0012: 类型“ILogger<>”在未引用的程序集中定义。必须添加对程序集“Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=adb9793829ddae60”的引用。”
dorainterception 使用 SourceGenerator
,这个技术处理的复杂度比较高,根据报错是 处理器中依赖的Logging组件无法解析,这个问题比较严重,因为依赖注入这个太重要了。该问题见于 pr https://github.com/jiangjinnan/Dora/pull/13
Autofac+Castle
为什么不想使用Autofac,笔者的考虑是Autofac虽然功能繁多,但是其实真正实际能用到的功能少之又少,大部分的功能都可以自己扩展出来。
借用下 https://github.com/dadhi/DryIoc 的一张性能比拼图
可见其实我们已经手握了一个高性能而且简单易用易扩展的ioc框架,合并要去另寻他处,如果因为AOP技术选型的原因,选择了autofac+Castle,那何不试下 整合 Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection和Castle.Core
综上
截止发稿为止,已经将本系列文章的研究成果总结至 https://github.com/gainorloss/microsoft-castle.git,并以发nuget至 https://www.nuget.org/packages/CastleCore.Extensions.DependencyInjection/1.1.0,
基准测试结果差强人意。castle代理的性能是原生的几百倍分之一,考虑到castle的广泛受众和稳定性,可堪一用。
本文但图一乐,请各位看官谨慎采纳,有意见请留言。
本文来自博客园,作者:张建wechatmedia.top,转载请注明原文链接:https://www.cnblogs.com/gainorloss/p/17965140